Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : COMS & the Ghost of USRX w/ other STUFF -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Moonray who wrote (10720)	12/15/1997 2:30:00 PM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 22053

OOPS. Someone screwed up. They're not supposed to upgrade until after the stock has gone up 20%.

To: Moonray who wrote (10720)	12/15/1997 2:30:00 PM
From: Scrapps	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 22053

>>>buy from accumulate<<< That's one I never have understood, is "accumulate" where one robs a stock broker?

To: Moonray who wrote (10720)	12/15/1997 6:16:00 PM
From: Bill Ulrich	Respond to of 22053

I wish our good pals at the Motley Clown would get a clue. They just ran a story saying that Bay had warned about meeting expectations. Bay's CFO, however, had just announced they were on target for the quarter. The Clowns response to a correction request: "Bay won't meet the analysts' overly-optimistic projections, thus it's considered a warning." One would assume that if Moonray, Inc. projects that it will make a dollar, and then Analyst X says, "No, I think you should make $1.25", then Moonray, Inc. says, "No, we'll make a buck just like we said" -- then this is not a warning; it's correcting someone else's stupidity. Where along the way did the analysts' get the right to make up numbers and then penalize the company for the analysts' folly? And where did the Motley Clowns get their journalism license? -MrB