To: bentway who wrote (145909 ) 9/15/2014 4:56:57 PM From: pcstel Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 149317 <President Bush has repeatedly refused to intervene to block profit gouging by power generating companies involved in the California energy crisis. < California built, or should I say, dismantled itself into a bad situation. California wanted deregulated power because they believed that it would lower costs via compeitiion, but due to poor planning and Environmental roadblocks, California lacked the internal infrastructure to provide peak power during the summer months of 2001. California had regulated price caps on the distributors of power, like SDG&E, on the price they could charge customers in California for electricity. But, as demand outstripped supply, The Distributors had to buy more power from the "open market", as prices rose in the "open market", the local suppliers were unable to pass the price increases onto the customer. The customer had no incentive to conserve, because their rates did not increase. So demand for electricity continued unabated, as Distributors, SDG&E, Edison, etc had to sell electricity below their cost, and the distributors were required to provide service to it's customers even though they had to sell at a Loss. This caused Distributors to file Bankruptcy and the providers of out of state power began limiting access to electricity because of significant doubts that they would get paid. This resulted in rolling blackouts. California fixed it's own problems without Federal Government intervention. Most importantly.. It removed the "price caps" that the Private Distributors could charge customers. This caused customers electric bills to rapidly rise, as customers soon had to pay "market rates" which in turn, dramatically reduced consumption. By September 2001, It was all over. Prices had fallen and normalized. California set themselves for Failure due to poor planning and poor decision making. Today, California's operates in a deregulated Power environment.with negotiated long term energy pricing. The market, acting as a market, fixed itself. Operators are able to charge customers at "non price capped" rates to encourage conservation. Customers are charged higher prices at higher usage levels, (stepped) Bush on a trip to California offered Financial Assistance to Low Income customers, and required US Military Facilities to decrease consumption by 10%, and stressed conservation. . Here is the California Energy Crisis Timeline..en.wikipedia.org In 1996. California passed "The Electric Utility Industry Restructuring Act" (Assembly Bill 1890) becomes law.April 1998 Spot market for energy begins operation. May 2000 Significant rise in energy price. June 14, 2000 Blackouts affect 97,000 customers in San Francisco Bay area during a heat wave . August 2000 San Diego Gas & Electric Company files a complaint alleging manipulation of the markets. January 17–18, 2001 Blackouts affect several hundred thousand customers. January 17, 2001 Governor Davis declares a state of emergency. March 19–20, 2001 Blackouts affect 1.5 million customers. April 2001 Pacific Gas & Electric Co. files for bankruptcy. May 7–8, 2001 Blackouts affect upwards of 167,000 customers. September 2001 Energy prices normalize.
Let me get this Straight.. Bush took the Oath of Office on January 20th, 2001. A couple of days before Bush's inauguration, , Calif. Governor Gray Davis declared a State of Emergency, while a "significant rise in energy prices began in May 2000, 9 months before Bush became President. Six months BEFORE Bush took office, San Diego Gas & Electric filed a complaint alleging manipulation of the markets. Who was in the Oval Office during this time period?? Not Bush.. But, Clinton.. SDG&E sent up the warning flags in August of 2000.. NOTHING WAS DONE. You want to blame someone, blame those that made the Distributors buy electricity at peak rates and sell it well below their costs. Sounds like Venezuela. And so it goes, PCSTEL