Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (58055)	9/16/2014 11:15:34 AM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

My, my, spewing so much rage, so early in the morning cannot be good for your health. Do yourself a favor and dial it down a few notches, Gramps. "you answered not a single one of my points." LOL! I answered them all, you just don't like the answers. That's tough. Let's take them one at a time. ....................................... Of course you define the "impossible" in terms of your Philosophical Naturalism prior to experience, rejecting any and all "evidence" of the supernatural as "impossible" out of hand. And so the circle goes. "Of course. That is the reasonable thing to do" <<Thanks for the admission>> "Stupid thing to thank me for but you are not too bright" You may believe your circular reasoning is justified. That doesn't make it any less circular. You want a piece of celery to keep you going? ...................................................... Since you didn't like my answer, perhaps you will do us all a favor and prove for us scientifically your belief that nothing exists beyond the natural world. Your inability to do so will allow us all to safely conclude that your position is not scientific but is a philosophical assumption that prejudices everything you say regarding what is and is not "possible"