SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (819537)11/28/2014 1:40:35 PM
From: bentway  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1586327
 
There is nothing in Scalia's remarks that is, in any way, at odds with what happened in the Wilson grand jury.
You didn't even READ them all, did you Dave?

Scalia:

As a consequence, neither in this country nor in England has the suspect under investigation by the grand jury ever been thought to have a right to testify or to have exculpatory evidence presented.



To: i-node who wrote (819537)12/1/2014 10:07:15 PM
From: Broken_Clock  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1586327
 
A "right" to testify suggests Wilson would have been able to DEMAND to testify and thus been able to do so

====

now that is some twisted logic.

By your "logic"

a 10 year old doesn't have the right to drink alcohol but he can legally demand to do so


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News