Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (819627)	11/28/2014 10:02:06 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1586458

You notice Dave says NOTHING about that! That is because he can't pontificate, obfuscate and try to spin that everyone else just doesn't understand how things work... It is hard to make up a framework where that can be viewed as the way it should be.

To: tejek who wrote (819627)	11/28/2014 11:28:54 PM
From: i-node	1 Recommendation Recommended By TopCat Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1586458

>> Of course Dave says nothing. He probably thinks its normal. Whites have to stick together you know. Of course it is "normal." There is absolutely zero conflict of interests in being the ministerial board member of a non-profit and being the prosecutor for the county. Shit. You people are idiots. Let me know when you are ready to eliminate the biggest conflict of interests in the entire world, which is the existence of public sector unions. Then, and only then, will you be taken seriously in opposing conflicts of interests. And, don't forget you had no problem with a Supreme Court justice who was a fanatical supporter of Obamacare and failed to recuse herself from hearing the Obamacare case. Yet, you find a conflict because this prosecutor sits on the Board of Directors of a non-profit that supports police officers? I guarantee you that board is packed with attorneys, judges, cops and I would not be surprised to find other prosecutors there. That's just a stupid claim. Ignorant, in fact.