Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : CFZ E-Wiggle Workspace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: POKERSAM who wrote (19317)	12/1/2014 7:35:22 PM
From: rayrohn	Respond to of 41419

from the 5 minute {seem the easiest to try an count lol}

To: POKERSAM who wrote (19317)	12/1/2014 7:48:32 PM
From: pedro_deleon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 41419

I won't speak for Ray, but here's what it tells me: absolutely nothing. One -- You don't specify the degree that you are claiming to be impulsive. Two -- In any event, impulsive wave structures lie within larger corrective moves. So showing impulses at one degree says nothing about the next higher degree. On the chart shown, I could easily discern a 5 wave A down, then a triangle B wave. If we get the C down, even in five waves, ITS A CORRECTION at the larger degree. Note that I said "could" and "If .." All we can surmise is that we should get another fiver down. Nothing more.