SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Kirk's Market Thoughts -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jerome who wrote (2374)12/3/2014 3:49:18 PM
From: Gottfried  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 26808
 
Jerome, the Barron's blogger deserves to be ignored. Same goes for another Hindenburg omen
Message 29835445

in the last 30 years it predicted 2 steep declines by giving the signal 27 times



To: Jerome who wrote (2374)12/8/2014 1:03:48 PM
From: Kirk ©  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 26808
 
An interesting cover story in Barrons about the 2000 tech bubble compared to today.

Google Search for "Tech Stocks: Sizing Up the New Bubble"

or settle for the sidebar conclusion: Investor worries about another dot-com-style stock crash miss the point. The bubble is in the private market.
Judged by profits, the stock market is much more reasonably priced than it was in 2000. The Dow now trades at 15 times next year’s expected earnings, versus 18 times back at the peak of the boom. The S&P 500 trades at 17 times earnings, versus 30 times. And perhaps most telling,the Nasdaq trades at 22 times earnings, against 102 times back in 2000.
The article neglects to point out that after the Enron disaster, the cost of accounting is far higher than in the past so companies stay private much longer since the accounting and other legal requirements are far less costly.
“In 2000, companies were going public as early as they could. It was a rite of passage,” says Kevin Landis, the veteran technology investor who ran the best-performing mutual fund in the U.S. leading up to the 2000 tech crash. “Today it’s a root canal that you keep avoiding.”
In 1999 and 2000, 632 technology companies went public, according to Ritter’s figures. Last year, the total was just 43. So far this year, there were just 46 tech offerings.
“If you look at Facebook and Twitter, the next generation of blue-chip stocks may be on their way to becoming that [size] even before they go public,” Landis says. “It’s a very tempting target for people trying to beat the indexes.”

The "unintended consequence" perhaps is small investors have lost out on some gains for successful companies that only the super wealthy now have access to.
Whether you view the growth of the private market as an example of institutional investors’ greed run amok, or as a healthy evolution in the capital markets, the good news is that retail investors are fairly well insulated from the most excessive valuations in technology and social-media stocks—at least for now. That could change once outfits like Uber, Dropbox, or Snapchat try to foist their shares off on the public at crazy prices

Of course, I believe some of my Fidelity Select mutual funds, and perhaps others, invest in "private equity" with some of the funds... And we get some second hand by owning Google, Intel and other tech stock companies with significant investment portfolios.