Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : FRANKLIN TELECOM (FTEL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: P.F. who wrote (23348)	12/17/1997 9:09:00 AM
From: Marvin Mansky	Respond to of 41046

IMO it is the irritating and demeaning attitude presented by some naysayers that initiates the responses you speak of. It's also, in many cases, a lack of accurate information offered to substantiate their positions and a clear reluctance to do their own DD. Negative information about a company is valuable but not when it is negative hype. A post such as yours is a reasonable request to understand. Marvin

To: P.F. who wrote (23348)	12/17/1997 9:20:00 AM
From: elk	Respond to of 41046

PF, My reaction to stt was due to the fact that he supposedly wanted information in regards to Intrine/Intelinet, received it but still continued to base his posts on ignorance. He based his trading decision(to supposedly buy FTEL) on 2 words in a press release. Surely, you did research before buying your shares of FTEL and had reasons to invest, that were based on solid fundamentals. If you wish to state those reasons and why they may have changed, that may be helpful to others(Though I am past the point of caring about other's reasons, no offense:-). However, from reading his posts, do you deduce that he is someone whose opinion on stocks merits serious consideration? Do you believe in his investment style? Following a run up without taking the time to research a company? I can only go by the words that are posted here, but I usually require some intelligence and logic before I add weight to any poster's thoughts. If someone decides that Intrine/Intelinet is not a major comapny or not a viable opportunity for FTEL to make money with, I wish they would state their reason, as opposed to saying, that they could find no information and draw their conclusions based on their own lack of research. Enough said on that topic and I won't post like this again. stt and the rest can say what they want, but be careful to whom you lend credence. PF the only opinion and motivation you can trust is your own. Besides Da Dah Dah Dah/Those storm winds are brewing!!!!!!! Evan

To: P.F. who wrote (23348)	12/17/1997 1:48:00 PM
From: Seth L.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 41046

PF you raise some valid concerns. I think most have been addressed here as best as we are able. The reason you hold your shares are your own. The reason I hold them is that I am way ahead at this point and to sell out now when the last cards are being played would be dumb. This money invested here is for speculation. Sure its a lot of money for some but my guess is that most of them that have a lot invested can afford to see this through. What puzzles me is this statement by you: Many of you obviously have unlimited time and resources to follow every hiccup of this company, and often use that knowledge to brutilize rather than enlighten those less knowledgeble. Is it not the point of this thread for us to pinch in to help uncover as much fact and information as possible? If not, than whats the purpose here?I work for myself, so at times I'm working 7 days 14 hrs. I use SI as a break while I am at my computer. Other times like this time of year I have nothing but time so if they hiccup I will hear it. Also Could you please expand on who has brutilized whom? Seth