Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : NNVC Keeping it real board for pro and con discussions -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: donpat who wrote (5)	12/16/2014 10:36:32 PM
From: NewMoney_812	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 326

No that's the rose colored glasses board where they don't want to hear anything negative about their stock. That's real nice and all but not really a good way to decide where to invest. Smart investors want, indeed they need to hear both sides. If one hates to hear the other side I would say they are losing the argument.

To: donpat who wrote (5)

12/21/2014 9:22:56 PM

From: Rawnoc

Respond to of 326

I never take blatant securities violations seriously -- which is why I posted it, but the authorities sure do.

NNVC tanked 31% following the dissemination of a knowingly false rumor accusing NNVC of fraud. I now have in my possession a confession that he "wholly fabricated" a knowingly false rumor accusing NNVC of fraud.

Do you have any idea how illegal that is? NNVC took a 31% nosedive due to that knowingly false rumor. If his goal was to tank NNVC's stock using illegal manipulation via a knowingly false accusation of fraud, then yes it was a raging success. ROFL!!!

To: drkaz who wrote (3208)	12/21/2014 9:13:48 PM
From: donpat	of 3499

That bit was by NNVC_skeptic and was a ruse to get the internet info on Rawnoc. It succeeded marvelously!