SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: combjelly who wrote (828025)1/6/2015 6:33:08 PM
From: locogringo1 Recommendation

Recommended By
FJB

  Respond to of 1575517
 
But that is a small subset of such cyclonic storms whose numbers and intensity have been increasing on a global basis.

Links and/or documentation to support of that line of bullshit .................please. TIA



To: combjelly who wrote (828025)1/6/2015 7:49:39 PM
From: Brumar893 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
locogringo
PKRBKR

  Respond to of 1575517
 
Weiner boy is wrong about hurricanes and cyclones worldwide:



Message 29538730 hurricane tornado drought



To: combjelly who wrote (828025)1/6/2015 9:44:57 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575517
 
But you can accept that a great deal of this is nonsense and demagoguery, no? For example, I saw this the other day as a "reason" why the Keystone XL is "bad for the economy":

Unemployment will rise: According to Mark Zandi, the Chief Economist of Moody’s Analytics: “Superstorm Sandy wreaked havoc on the job market in November, slicing an estimated 86,000 jobs from payrolls.” In the wake of Hurricane Irene, the number of workers filing unemployment claims in Vermont went from 731 before Irene to 1,331 two weeks afterwards. Hurricane Katrina wiped out 129,000 jobs in the New Orleans region “” nearly 20 percent. For the U.S. economy as a whole, 2011 cost US taxpayers $52 billion.

You really have to admit this is an absurd analysis, even coming from Zandi (who is known for ridiculous nonsense). From a supporter of the Broken Window theory, even. How the hell does that even make sense? Yet, somehow, he's tied the XL into climate change (I guess) then to the economy. It is a huge stretch, yet it rolls right off liberal tongues.

We got Obamacare in large part because of the successful disinformation campaign waged by the Left. And the day after it was signed into law, all those concerns were out the window and preserving the legislation became the objective rather than better health care being the objective.

We really don't need to continue down this road. If the Left wants to ignorantly take this path again I think you're going to find it a much tougher direct than before because the American people were badly fucked over on Obamacare. They're not going to sit still for having some anti global warming nonsense rammed down their throats. I don't think they will, anyway.



To: combjelly who wrote (828025)1/7/2015 7:12:16 AM
From: Bill4 Recommendations

Recommended By
Brumar89
locogringo
PKRBKR
TideGlider

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1575517
 
I just asked a couple of simple questions and expected a more factual answer back from you. If you claim extreme weather events are increasing but can't define extreme weather or show any increase, who is really the nitwit?