Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ed Lamb who wrote (7453)	12/17/1997 2:20:00 PM
From: Bear Down	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

SFA has never worked on FL material ...that I accept as fact. Can we be hypothetical for a minute. Scenerio: naxos gives ledoux a sample, Ledoux splits it, treats half with J/L then SFA, treats other half with SFA only. Results #1 Readings for SFA=.06 gpt, readings with J/L + SFA= .3 gpt this shows J/L is responsible for greater recovery and I am convinced that Naxos has the next best thing to sliced bread on the other hand if: Result #2 Readings for SFA=.06 gpt, readings with J/L + SFA= .06 then it is obvious that the "process" doesn't work and this is all a bunch of salesmanship. Quite simple, yet quite accurate. I wouldn't be surprised if Ledoux thought the last numbers were a little on the high side and did a test similar to this before actual certification. Isn't a test using known controls how science has proven almost everything? If you are going to rewrite science the least we could do is use scientific methods.