SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : NETZ - gets deal with DEC! future 100 bagger? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: FTJoe who wrote (1383)12/17/1997 4:21:00 PM
From: Dusty Reed  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1702
 
I'm not sure this is what you want. Hope it helps.

By Deborah Lohse Staff Reporter of The Wall Street Journal

Trying to distance itself from some of Wall Street's smallest and most
speculative companies, the Nasdaq Stock Market's parent board is
expected to vote on whether to make about 3,400 stocks no longer
eligible to trade on the market's lowest rung.

The rung, known as the OTC Bulletin Board, is essentially an
electronic-trading forum run by Nasdaq where brokers and dealers
can get up-to-date quotes, trading data, and a list of market makers
in roughly 6,800 Bulletin Board securities.

But stocks on the board aren't listed on the Nasdaq market itself,
which can be a touchy issue, since Nasdaq's name is often linked to
them. That is true even though the companies that list on the board
either can't meet listing standards at markets like Nasdaq, or they
don't want to file financial statements with the Securities and
Exchange Commission. These unlisted issues include foreign securities
known as American depositary receipts, and small regional
companies, such as banks that don't seek much stock trading.

The latest proposal is part of a long struggle for Nasdaq to shake off an image of being a forum rife with small-stock scams. In recent years
especially, Nasdaq has gained credibility by beefing up trading rules
and standards for companies that trade in its top-tier National
Market, home to such giants as Microsoft and Intel, or its second-tier
SmallCap Market. But since April, Frank Zarb, chairman of the
National Association of Securities Dealers, Nasdaq's parent, has been
trying to find a way to clean up the loosely regulated OTC Bulletin
Board, which is run by Nasdaq but which has almost no standards for
the companies that list there.

Now, board members of Nasdaq's parent organization are expected to
tentatively approve a proposal to kick companies off the OTC Bulletin
Board if they don't file financial statements to SEC, banking or
insurance regulators, according to people familiar with the proposal.
NASD officials said that it is their policy not to discuss proposals
before the board meets. Board members are also expected to discuss
prohibiting brokerage firms from quoting prices for OTC Bulletin
Board stocks if the brokers don't have current, reliable financial
information on a company.

Also, every broker that recommends a bulletin board stock to a client
would have to review detailed financial statements of the company
before doing so. Finally, the proposal would also require every investor to get a disclosure statement that would spell out the difference between the bulletin board and other markets, in terms of liquidity (or ease of trading), standards, and market-maker obligations, according to people familiar with the proposal. If the NASD board approves the proposal Thursday, it will be put out for comment by members.

But these actions won't rid the marketplace of companies that fail to
file publicly available financial statements, people familiar with the
proposal say. Any of the companies that fails to meet the raised
standards of the bulletin board would be able to trade on the Pink
Sheets, a less automated system that is owned by the National
Quotation Bureau, which isn't affiliated with Nasdaq. Standards for
the Pink Sheets aren't expected to be affected by this proposal.

Thus, investors in these speculative stocks likely would find it more
difficult to buy and sell them. OTC Bulletin Board stocks are a little
more convenient to trade, because Nasdaq provides space on its
trading workstations for bulletin-board stock quoting. Investors in the Pink Sheets must get most of their information, and trade, over the phone.

Currently, stocks can trade on either the OTC Bulletin Board or the
Pink Sheets as long as one market maker "vouches" that the company
has current financial statements. Market makers do this by filing a
15c2-11 form. Because all market makers are NASD members, the
NASD has responsibility for ensuring that market makers are abiding
by that rule.

Securities regulators have expressed alarm that unscrupulous
promoters, brokers and traders have taken advantage of the loosely
regulated marketplace to foist worthless stocks on unwitting investors.
Securities regulators have brought a steady stream of
stock-manipulation and conspiracy cases to stem such abuses, which
are considered easier to pull off on the bulletin board because of its
thin trading volume and relative obscurity.

(c) 1997 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

Dusty



To: FTJoe who wrote (1383)12/17/1997 4:55:00 PM
From: DGMAC  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1702
 
FTJ, go to nasdr.com

When you are at the NASDR site, then scroll down to:

NASD Announces Changes of Micro-Cap Market--December 11, 1997

I also saw a couple articles over on CNBC this morning, but failed to bookmark them. I also read something from the SEC yesterday pertaining to BB's but it discussed cold calling more than anything else, yet generally speaking, the SEC is starting to focus attention on BB fraud.

DGMAC