Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : OILEX (OLEX) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: OFW who wrote (2045)	12/17/1997 4:28:00 PM
From: Marty Rubin	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4276

Hi Offie, As a person who plans to pick around helf of what Baron picked today, can you please express your real concern about the company? I DON'T appricate giving away the 500K to Allen Jones. The way I see it is that is was clearly made bacase of the low stock price. I don't know why he likes him that much. BTW- When AJ got out of Oilex, and then latter of ISSM, he said he will sell his ISSM's stake and hold on to OLEX's. As I said before, WHAT THE COMPANY NEEDS IS OIL. Adding Allen Jones will only increase the dilution--nothing more.(it aint a consolting firm yet. From oil to pr is a long mile) This is why I ask whether the company has any personal agenda/friendships with Allen Jones. About NASD's plan to kick out non-reporting co.s: The WSJ reported on Monday (Most likely: Section C1) that NASD in concernd and prepared to handle the companies who choose to stay on BB by filling false SEC statments. We may not see justice in BBs too soon. The company should prepare itself to get out of this BB and meen it. Good day, Marty PS You may infer from my prev. post that I put the blame on you (for manip. the stock). This is very far from the truth. Volume today: Close to 6M shares. I'm not excited. I only calculate a small fraction as "real" volume.

To: OFW who wrote (2045)	12/17/1997 5:01:00 PM
From: Marty Rubin	Respond to of 4276

Steve, Re. my qoute: "You may infer from my prev. post that I put the blame on you (for manip. the stock). This is very far from the truth." The nice way to explain your negative postings is that when you're a shareholder, you tend to look at all the positives and can, at times, close your eyes to avoid seenig the negatives. I try to see it both ways and I want to thank Larry (for the positves) and you (for the negatives) for halping me see both sides. I know Larry has a lot more to say (good things) about the company but he's probably like me: Fed up with wasting his time. Out of 30 posts on the SI only one can get a rating of 9. Have a great day, Marty Thanks for post #2048 Ajay, Call one of the MMs. I don't feel like spending anouther second on the SI. MR Sorry but the volume was close to 6.6M. Now that I already came back (15min.) I'll say that by "real" I meen that the MMs, almsot (364 out of 365-I presume) every day shift their stock between each other. It could be for many reasons. Some to creat volume, tax loss (buying it back), they don't want to hold too many/little so they share with others MMs...or a thousand morereasons.