Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kim W. Brasington who wrote (7464)	12/17/1997 5:43:00 PM
From: Whomerun	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

Kim, Possibly I missed the answer - it was asked earlier why is Naxos paying BD to insure COC samples and then come out with a statement ( last press release ) that sounded like they weren't SURE COC was obtained. Someone asked - did Naxos really PAY BD for that kind of half a_ _ ed work and comment? Interested in your comment as to their verbage and work performed! Thanks LWG

To: Kim W. Brasington who wrote (7464)	12/17/1997 6:49:00 PM
From: Rich	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

Kim, Are there currently any estimates on the production costs involved with the Johnson/Lett process and what that does to the total production cost per ounce? Thanks Rich

To: Kim W. Brasington who wrote (7464)	12/17/1997 7:12:00 PM
From: Anne Lamb	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

Evenin Kim, Thanks for the information..I wonder if you could address the hesitations of the gold letter writers. Todays edition of Ron Struthers letter is basically pro- Naxos..however..he brings up the problem of ever being able to mine at those deep depths because it would become a mudhole..<underground river?> Have samples ever been taken at shallower depths? He also brings up the strict environmental laws in California.. has the company done a study on this ..is it ongoing? I appreciate any input. Anne

To: Kim W. Brasington who wrote (7464)	12/17/1997 10:37:00 PM
From: Eric Tai	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

Kim, Can you explain to us clearly why Ledoux allowed Naxos to report the results but not certify the results, as it used to do? Did Ledoux issue official report on the recent results? Did Ledoux test multiple times, with certain consistency, before they allowed Naxos to report on the recent results? Did Ledoux concur on the release of the lastest results? This way at least we can avoid having someone trying to mislead the others by saying "Ledoux can't certify the results" instead of "Ledoux haven't certified the results yet".