Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alighieri who wrote (833018)	1/28/2015 12:53:35 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578191

>> zObamacare mandates a minimum sets of benefits that all policies had to comply with...which is why people lost existing policies...they did not comply with ACA. My policy was better than any policy under Obamacare. At least for my circumstances. And this has been the case for a vast number of people which is why more people report having been harmed by Obamacare than helped by it.

To: Alighieri who wrote (833018)	1/28/2015 12:53:49 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	1 Recommendation Recommended By THE WATSONYOUTH Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1578191

Al, But it is clear and it has been published by multiple sources that the escalation of health care costs has slowed...partly because of the recession we went through and perhaps partly because of ACA. The slowing of the escalation happened before ObamaCare (at least the "Care" portion of it) kicked in. I'm pretty sure in the next few years we'll see those health care costs climb back up at rates never seen before. Higher demand for limited supply tends to do that. It's not going to be pretty for Obama and his legacy. All he can do is point to the number of uninsured, which has unarguably gone down due to ObamaCare. Tenchusatsu