Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : STOCKS WITH ATTITUDE TEAM - FA/TA AND EVERYTHING ELSE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: David Smith who wrote (496)	12/17/1997 8:04:00 PM
From: Sergio H	Respond to of 2377

Chris; Please try to act in a contructive fashion while visiting us on this thread. It is not appropriate for you to tell me my business. I don't have any questions for you but welcome yours as long as you behave civily. Jealousy, envy and bitterness I leave to the good Dr. Freud. INCA is instinet and is very selective as to who can be a subscriber. For the most part your statement is correct, but when you state individuals can post on there, I tend to differ. First of all and I quote from Instinets web page "Instinet provides services to fund managers, brokers, dealers, exchange floor specialists, and analysts at all phases of the trading cycle". I do not see anywhere where they specify "individuals". Does your individual mean analyst, seems you erred here like maybe I did in stating only MM. Sergio

To: David Smith who wrote (496)	12/17/1997 8:09:00 PM
From: Al Greenleaf	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2377

Christopher - I for one appreciate the information you are bringing regarding just who INCA might be. "POSSIBLY been a MM" yes. What several posters object to, myself included, is the lack of good manners in your post. Statements like "It's clearly not a business for you" and "(jealousy, envy, bitterness...I'm not sure, but it's amusing nonetheless)" reflect an arrogance and pettiness that is not welcome. You made some good points earlies about the value of T/A on "under $10 stock", with which I agree. This and other information is most useful. Understand that most of us do not trade for a living and are very open to constructive commentary. Could you be a little less contentious in your posts please? They will get a wider audience and will be more thoroughly considered. Thank you. -Al

To: David Smith who wrote (496)	12/17/1997 8:49:00 PM
From: TripleWitching	Respond to of 2377

Chris Your statement is correct but Sergios statement seems to clarify both of you. TORO