Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Ride the Tiger with CD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ayeyou who wrote (237329)	2/14/2015 7:37:34 AM
From: jpthoma1	1 Recommendation Recommended By Rocket Red Respond to of 312259

NEWPORT will win their case. These petroleum royalties were obtained in 2002 and have ALWAYS, I repeat ALWAYS be mentionned in a note their annual audited financial statements. Unfortunately people don't read them (except a few bright investors!). These royalties began producing revenues in 2012 . And the market discovered it in 2014, many months after I did !!!!! I wrote about that story on Le Coin des Prospecteurs last year: Message 29742186 ;o) This proof that "the market is not always right"!!!! sedar.com

To: ayeyou who wrote (237329)	2/14/2015 8:11:04 AM
From: jpthoma1	1 Recommendation Recommended By Rocket Red Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 312259

I just add to my previous comment that for many months, Newport had in its bank account 3.5 times more money (20 cents per share) than its market value (6 cents per share). Investors that were selling at that time were just stupid investors!!!! Actually, there over 35 exploration companies that have more cash in their bank account that the value of their market cap. Many are dormant, as Newport was. And there are thousands of stupid investors that are selling these shares!!!! And only a few bright investors are buying!! ;o)