Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (841071)	3/7/2015 12:44:40 PM
From: bentway	1 Recommendation Recommended By J_F_Shepard Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578198

I've shown you the latest science, Dave. The latest and largest study, that doesn't support your thesis.

To: i-node who wrote (841071)	3/7/2015 1:19:05 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578198

Any sexual behavior is a choice, whether it is to go whoring, devotion to a spouse, hitting up a sheep or anything else. Assuming sexual orientation is equal to a choice in sexual activity is simply to remove morality from the equation all together. Morality involves conscious consideration and choice making. Obviously we can see kids who seem to have more or less testosterone and so it supports the idea of a biological orientation at least for those kids, noting these greater or lesser (from the norm) kids are a tiny fraction of the population. In modern times, I see sexual orientation being assigned to infants or to little kids who want to play dress up. Then I see the same kind of cultural sexualization process being acted out, as it has throughout history but at a much earlier age and absent the concept of deviation from the norm. Maybe that is because modern sexualization of kids condones deviancy (a word that has become taboo).