SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (842482)3/13/2015 1:21:29 AM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572935
 
>> He is not a fine American patriot. He is an extreme ideologue playing with being a traitor. You need to learn to choose your heroes wisely.

You really have no idea what a "traitor" is. A traitor is a person who betrays his country. No person in his right mind could classify any of those senators as having "betrayed" their country. I think the Three Stooges who went to Baghdad could properly be classified as traitors -- they stood on enemy territory and attacked our president showing favoritism for the nation's enemy.


Interfering in sensitive negotiations is not the job of Congress. They stepped outside their role inappropriately.


These people effectively said, "The president may very well not know his own limitations (he isn't really up to the intellectual par with say, George Bush). But we think you need to know: The president of the United States isn't allowed to run off making these deals without us, the Senate, approving of them. And he isn't asking our permission. Just be aware that any deal you reach is tentative."

You know.........you are crazy. GW Bush was and is an idjit. It seems mostly everyone knows that but you and some of your neighbors.



To: i-node who wrote (842482)3/13/2015 1:25:42 AM
From: tejek1 Recommendation

Recommended By
bentway

  Respond to of 1572935
 
Cotton finds himself right where he wants to be

03/12/15 12:49 PM



By Steve Benen



His stunt is moving his party further from its own goals. His allies are scrambling to make excuses for the fiasco he spearheaded. Observers from the left, right, center are using words like “ disgrace,” “ dangerous,” and “ stupid” while condemning his gambit to sabotage his own country’s foreign policy.

Taken together, it’s tempting to think Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), whose letter to Iran is effectively its own scandal, is having a career-ending, credibility-killing week. But by all appearances, the right-wing Arkansan is actually riding high.

With his missive to Iran’s political leadership, ultimately co-signed with 46 of his GOP colleagues, and the fallout over his unusual attempt to circumvent the president’s foreign policy deal-making, Cotton has rocketed to the top of TV bookers’ lists, and fellow Republican senators are suddenly flocking to him for counsel on foreign policy.

All before he’s even given his maiden speech on the Senate floor.

The headline on the Politico piece heralded Cotton as a “GOP phenom” whose radical stunt has “endeared him to Republicans.”

It’s amazing to see how this works. Steve M. argued this week, “This is how it always goes with the GOP – a Republican does one showboating, immature, possibly reckless thing, and he or she (usually he) is an immediate star. Look at Ted Cruz. Look at Rand Paul. Look at Ben Carson.”

Paul Waldman added that the Iran letter from the 47 Senate Republicans “looks like quite the fiasco,” except Cotton “is probably saying, ‘That worked out great!’”


As amazing as all of this is, no one should be surprised.

As a Senate candidate in Arkansas last year, after less than one term in the U.S. House, Cotton told voters they should worry about ISIS terrorists joining forces with Mexican drug cartels and targeting Arkansas. The argument didn’t make a lick of sense, but the Republican lawmaker didn’t care.

Around the same time, Cotton was caught
brazenly lying about Congress’ farm bill. When confronted with reality, he said he didn’t care and would repeat the falsehoods anyway.

The fact that Cotton would continue ridiculous antics after winning the election shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone.

What matters, though, is the Republican embrace of this brand of political extremism and celebrating Cotton in the wake of this week’s controversy. After he created what was effectively an international incident, his fellow GOP lawmakers are “suddenly flocking to him for counsel on foreign policy”? Two bumbling months into his term, Arkansas Republicans are gearing up for his 2020 presidential campaign?

This really isn’t healthy.



To: i-node who wrote (842482)3/13/2015 5:53:00 AM
From: Alighieri  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1572935
 
An Open Letter to 47 Republican Senators of the United States of America from Iran’s Hard-Liners

You have opened our eyes. We are brothers
By William Saletan

Members of Iran's Assembly of Experts, Mohammad Taghi Mesbah-Yazdi (upper right) and head of the Council of Guardians, Ahmad Jannati (upper center), attend a session to appoint a new chairman on March 10, 2015, in Tehran.Photo by Behrouz Mehri/AFP/Getty Images

March 11, 2015

Dear senators:

Thank you for your letter of March 9 explaining your system of government. We were unfamiliar with the complexity of your laws. For three years we have been negotiating a nuclear energy agreement with your president. We now realize our mistake. As your letter makes clear, the authority to establish such agreements on behalf of your country rests with your Congress.

We are in your debt for this clarification. Moreover, your letter has prompted us to undertake a broader study of the American political system. What we have learned has opened our eyes. For 35 years, we have treated you as an adversary. Our intelligence agencies told us that your culture and your political system were radically different from ours. We now understand that we were misled. Your country is much like ours. Indeed, your Republican Congress is much like our revolutionary Islamic councils. We are brothers.

Your letter explains that our discussions with your president have been in vain because “anything not approved by Congress is a mere executive agreement,” which can easily be cast aside by a future president or Congress. Under your Constitution, as you point out, “the president may serve only two 4-year terms, whereas senators may serve an unlimited number of 6-year terms.” Therefore, the ultimate authority to make and interpret your country’s policies resides with you, not with your president. As you note, “President Obama will leave office in January 2017, while most of us will remain in office well beyond then—perhaps decades.”

Your Republican Congress is much like our revolutionary Islamic councils.

We were delighted to read this sentence. What you have described—a circle of overseers who work in perpetuity to restrain the president—is very familiar to us. Our president, like yours, is limited to two consecutive four-year terms. His powers are also severely circumscribed. He has a national security council, but he and his council do not establish our nation’s policies.

In our system, true power lies with the chamber that oversees the president. For you, this chamber is the Senate, controlled by your Republican caucus. For us, it is the Council of Guardians. Members of our council, like members of your Senate, serve six-year terms. The council may veto any legislation, which, in its judgment, violates our republic’s guiding body of law. For us, that body of law is Sharia.

Our intelligence agencies told us that in your country, the guiding document is your Constitution. Recently, however, we watched videos from your “Conservative Political Action Conference.” Several of your senators spoke there about the abomination of homosexual marriage and the importance of protecting religion. Our assessment is that your senators interpret your Constitution in accordance with the Christian Bible, just as our council applies our Constitution in the light of the Holy Quran. We particularly enjoyed the speech of your senator from Texas, Ted Cruz, who called on your government to fight for Christians abroad. This is in agreement with our own policy of coming to the aid of faithful Muslims everywhere.

We are in great admiration of Sen. Cruz. In our republic, he would be an Ayatollah Uzma. We appreciate his signature on your letter and his steadfastness in correcting your president. Many of us were dismayed to learn that Sen. Cruz was criticized in your country for withholding the government’s operating funds in order to block the implementation of a health care law. Some Americans even called the senator a hostage taker.

We also very much admire the principal author of your letter, Sen. Tom Cotton of Arkansas. Sen. Cotton, like many of our young militiamen, served in combat in Iraq and believes that he is an instrument of God. Some may consider him too young to assert dominion over your country’s foreign policy, at 37 years of age and with only two years of political experience. But we in Iran appreciate his vigor. He reminds us of the young men who seized your embassy here in 1979, two years after he was born. Those brave young revolutionaries did not wait for guidance from their elders.

In Iran, all educational institutions are governed by our Cultural Revolution Council, which safeguards the faith of the people. We have been unable to locate such a council in your federal government. However, we recently learned that the state board of education in Sen. Cruz’s state, Texas, controls through its purchasing power the content of textbooks throughout your country. The board has used this power to limit the teaching of evolution and promote the celebration of your country as a Christian nation. Our cultural council protects Islam in the same way.

Our system, like yours, has its critics. Some portray our Council of Guardians as unelected ideologues who override the will of the people. The charge is absurd, as your own experience demonstrates. In your country’s three most recent elections, which together produced your Senate’s entire current membership, the other party’s nominees won 5 million more votes than yours did. Nevertheless, you control the chamber. The true will of the people, as you know, is to follow those of us who understand what is best.

Thank you once again for this enlightening exchange. Prompted by your letter, our council has decided to end the talks with your secretary of state and dismiss nuclear inspectors from our country. We look forward to working with you in the future on other matters of common interest, such as prayer, capital punishment, and troops in Iraq.

Sincerely,

Council of Guardians
The Islamic Republic of Iran



To: i-node who wrote (842482)3/13/2015 7:52:51 AM
From: bentway  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 1572935
 
A traitor is a person who betrays his country.
Which is what Republicans have been doing since Obama was elected. Anything Obama proposes or supports is opposed, even if it's GOOD for the country.