Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alighieri who wrote (843622)	3/19/2015 10:53:54 AM
From: i-node	2 Recommendations Recommended By THE WATSONYOUTH TideGlider Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575341

>> why don't you explain the clearer and more dramatic drop between the mid 2013 18% and the 12.9 we find today? If not ACA, then what? I have not tried to attribute it to anything other than the ACA. But I have pointed out that the uninsured rate would NEVER have been 18% in the first place had it not been for the ACA. And I have pointed out that the real drop is substantially less than (18.0-12.9), since the 18% level is a product of the ACA itself. We have not come close to getting value for the ACA. You don't spent a trillion dollars or more over 10 years to get a two or three point drop in the level of uninsured, leaving 13%.