Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (860278)	5/27/2015 5:37:52 PM
From: bentway	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576811

<<So, is it your position that the future us the US is not potentially affected?>> That isn't my position, nor is it our great president Obama's! The both of us feel there are MANY other actors, some local, some much closer than us, that need to fully engage ISIS before WE put even one trooper's boot on the ground. No more 'world cop'.

To: i-node who wrote (860278)	5/28/2015 3:19:47 PM
From: THE WATSONYOUTH	1 Recommendation Recommended By FJB Respond to of 1576811

Everyone is tired of the wars. Myself included. .....I don't claim to know enough details to list a complete set of things we should do............but I'd have unlimited airstrikes against any realistic target with special forces on the ground as spotters......I would arm the Kurds DIRECTLY with sufficient heavy weapons to counter any ISIS weapons superiority. I would stop any oil exportation out of the area.either by pipeline or tanker truck. Simple strafing will stop any tanker trunk movement in short order. My understanding is we do NONE of these things.