Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Zenyatta Free Speech Board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: hoov who wrote (1211)	6/19/2015 2:16:08 PM
From: Bills16	2 Recommendations Recommended By cbs12311 Tidal Pool Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 22811

Love it! You seem to like to post inferences and then claim ignorance when questioned. Are you sure you're not my ex in disguise? :) You suggested it was advantageous for AE to stay running this company as, "Aubrey paid a fraction of a cent per share. Meanwhile, he's getting a large salary, and travel expenses, etc." I was simply stating that your logic escapes myself. If AE wanted the cash, he could have sold his shares at $4, made 4x his yearly salary in investments on the interest alone and started a new company. Obviously he didn't sell at $4 for a reason and it will be interesting to see his reasoning. I still like the comparison between the two companies when it comes to executive compensation since that was your point about AE. Supposedly, according to Chief, it's higher in the other company because they're working so hard. ZEN pays their CFO 12k per year, but the other company pays their CFO 120k. How can a CFO work 10x harder than another? Are they filling out 40 quarterly reports and 10 year end reports? lol It seems a bit excessive in comparison.