Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : GOLD-XAU -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: philv who wrote (774)	12/20/1997 2:09:00 PM
From: PaulM	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1756

But Phil, we have the invisible hand on our side. EOM.

To: philv who wrote (774)	12/20/1997 3:05:00 PM
From: Eashoa' M'sheekha	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1756

If It's Good For IBM And Good For GE...Why Not Barrick? I noticed a negative slant towards ABX when they announced their buy- back plans,yet euforia and glee on the other two.Nope:This ain't no free market..this is maniputlation of the highest order,propagated and condoned in the mainstream media.How many,in the name of God,are truly involved in this Gold thang.Seems everyone's taken their positions,but very few are saying anything.When will the truth be revealed by the media.Likely long after the fact.....remember Bre-x?Same same..... Anywhooo.........a little read on ECU for all. canoe.ca Also at that site some info on the Northern Peso(Loonie,No Doubt<g>). We are " between a rock and a hard place ",with regard to the 70 cent exchange rate.See,we need a gold standard!!It's the only way to stop the madness and stabilize global trade and currency imbalances. Merry Christmas To All Who Observe. Taurus