Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (183223)	7/18/2015 12:59:32 PM
From: longnshort	2 Recommendations Recommended By FJB isopatch Respond to of 224750

nope 21 years no warming via satellite, that's the most accurate. Land temps change have you seen where they take those temps, next to black asphalt runways, those same temps were taken in the 1800s were there runways next to them ? of course they would be higher. Large cities are heat sinks no so much in the 1800s. Have you noticed when the weather guys give the daily temps they are higher in the cities than the suburbs even if the burbs are north or south of the city. that's should make one think.....oh wait you are a liberal...never mind

To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (183223)	7/19/2015 10:56:42 PM
From: weatherguru	2 Recommendations Recommended By TideGlider tonto Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 224750

First of all, the data you refer to is 'adjusted' by biased scientists, I've shown you the e-mails to prove it. Second, how does persistence prove anything? The oceans are the Earth's thermostat and dampen any potential rapid variations in global temperatures. For example on the annual scale, why are June/July/August the 3 hottest months of the year? It's persistence of the signal. If 30-year cycles in the oceans are well-established as normal, then why wouldn't warm years cluster together? Throw in other higher-frequency cycles, and temperatures vary year-to-year, but the lowest-frequency are the most powerful. Atlantic Ocean. livescience.com Pacific Ocean (from University of Washington) atmos.washington.edu Everyone admits to these powerful low-frequency patterns, but in the end, the media exclude all of it from any discussion.