SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (112676)7/19/2015 2:38:51 PM
From: John Vosilla5 Recommendations

Recommended By
bart13
dvdw©
Fiscally Conservative
George Statham
RetiredNow

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 217886
 
Only Reagan? What about what happened in 1965 and 1971 and 1999 to bring us to where we are? In this century we have the Fed blowing up asset bubble after asset bubble, misallocation of capital. capitalism and socialism on steroids with such wealth disparity Gilded age elites have surpassed 1929 peak, hollowing out of the middle class with costs rising at an incredible clip on most things people need, race and class mistrust like nothing I've ever seen and so many more on the dole, broken families and prison all a deadly combination. I thought no president could be worse than GWB but Obama is catching up fast, I though no elected official so high up could be worse than Cheney but Holder has already surpassed him in my view..Debt went from $5T to $18T this century with Reagan basically dead the entire time

In CA it is a total house of cards economy doesn't work anymore for the honest hard working middle class still left trying to make it.. Congrats on NASDQ breaking the previous highs out there. At least for us 'idiots' in middle America and the south it still works for now



To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (112676)7/19/2015 2:39:51 PM
From: John Vosilla1 Recommendation

Recommended By
bart13

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 217886
 
San Francisco vs America in Housing Bubble 2by Wolf Richter • June 21, 2015



Everybody called it “Housing Bubble” after it imploded. Crazy things had been encouraged to happen to drive home prices into the stratosphere. Risks homebuyers and lenders took were enormous. Shady dealings everywhere. Everybody loved it. Governments at all levels incited it because tax revenues soar during housing bubbles. The housing industry did whatever it took to get there. Lenders got rich funding it. The Fed was looking down upon its creation with a divine sense of satisfaction. Then….

But that’s like so 2008.

What’s going on today isn’t a housing bubble, of course. Nationwide, home prices are now finally close to where they’d been at the peak of the prior housing bubble. Still not totally there, but almost. During the peak of the prior bubble, the median price of existing homes was $230,000. In April 2015, it was $223,000. Just $7,000 shy. 3%! With a little effort and luck in 2015, home prices will finally exceed the crazy peak during the mother of all housing bubbles. Thank you hallelujah Fed for recreating the housing bubble, version 2.

But real estate is local, so prices vary. In San Francisco, something peculiar has been happing. Since January 2012, the median price for all types of homes has shot up 107%, according to Paragon Real Estate Group’s June 2015 report. Now 42% higher than during the peak of the prior all-time crazy bubble.

The median house price – not home price, thus excluding condos and TICs – has shot up 96% since January 2012, to reach $1,360,000 in May. Condos have hit a median price of $1,142,500.

Just how crazy has San Francisco’s housing market become? Here is Paragon’s chart of home prices going back to 1971. It compares San Francisco median house prices to the median prices of existing homes in California and nationwide. I circled in red Housing Bubble 1 and Housing Bubble 2, the latter being now in majestic bloom:



At the peak of Housing Bubble 1, the median house price in San Francisco was four times higher than the median price of existing homes in the US. It is now six timeshigher.

Is the median household income in San Francisco six times higher than in the US? Heck no! It’s $77,700; in the US, it’s $51,900 (2013). Incomes are 50% higher, home prices are nearly 500% higher. Go figure
….

The US housing industry is still talking about the market not having “fully recovered yet.” The crazy peak of Housing Bubble 1 has now become the base line. The industry lives for housing bubbles. That’s when its actors get rich – and damn the torpedoes.

California overall is still not quite back at the tippy top of Housing Bubble 1, as some of the areas have been shameful laggards in this craziness. But the national median price of existing homes is only 3% below where it was during the craziest days of Housing Bubble 1. And the industry is hopeful to breach the old record soon.

Housing Bubble 2 has shifted the dynamics, with the “sweet spot” moving ever higher on the pricing scale. During the first five months of this year in San Francisco, a total of 1,941 homes were sold, but only 51 were in the under-$500K price range, or about 2.6% of all sales. You don’t even want to know what less than $500K buys in San Francisco. And only 342 homes of all types, or 17.6% of total sales, were in the under-$750K price range.

The chart by Paragon, based on sales reported to MLS by June 1, shows where the action is:



Paragon’s Chief Market Analyst, Patrick Carlisle:

Four years ago, one found the most homes for sale in the $600,000 to $750,000 price segment. Now $1 million to $1.5 million is the “sweet spot” for San Francisco home prices.

So, if you can’t afford that – even if you were born and raised in the city and had no intention ever of leaving – leave; that’s the message of these prices. Make room for people that can afford them. Or shack up with five other people.

San Francisco, while extreme, isn’t the only city with this kind of pricing insanity. It fits neatly into the central-bank scheme of inflating all asset prices into absurdity on a global scale: five-year government bonds in Europe that have soared to such levels that yields have become negative; Chinese stocks that have lost all connection to reality; etc. etc. And well, median home prices that have moved far beyond the reach of the median household income.

But in San Francisco, we know how to deal with this: “Riding this wave while we can, as far as we can, for as long as we can.” Because we know it’s not going to last. Read… San Francisco Home Prices Spike, Exuberance Reigns

wolfstreet.com



To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (112676)7/19/2015 5:04:55 PM
From: bart13  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217886
 
You can keep saying that "Ronald Reagan was the mystery ingredient which put debt back into fashion", but unfortunately the facts remain that Obama leads Reagan on government debt growth by well over a country mile when the raw data is adjusted by both CPI and on a per capita basis, in order to provide a fair comparison.

Extreme political bias and hate sure does aid blinders to the actual record.



And total taxes, per the Tax Foundation, show that they were higher under Reagan than Obama, although Obama is catching up. Total taxes were way higher under Clinton too.



When you're stuck in a deep hole, stop digging yourself even deeper.