Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (874877)	7/24/2015 12:02:53 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1578105

Right. So how did cotton get picked between the end of the Civil War and the rise of the machine? Sharecroppers. Sharecroppers were not as efficient as slaves. But poor whites got pulled into the system to help balance things out. And they were cheaper than keeping slaves. What's really important is government was screwing up the process. Attrition could take its toll gradually as people were able to retrain and move on to other work, be absorbed slowly by the system. What we've done today is to create a culture of unemployment that cannot hope to be absorbed by a system that isn't producing jobs due to government strangling economic growth. When I was a kid everyone had Summer jobs picking where I lived. Some cotton, others tomatoes, other crops. No one worried about minimum wages or withholding taxes, any of it. White kids, black kids, it didn't matter, no one cared. It was pocket money.

To: combjelly who wrote (874877)

7/24/2015 4:14:32 PM

From: J_F_Shepard

Respond to of 1578105

Slavery would have died out as soon as the plantation owners discovered the economics of sharecroppers.

I doubt sharecroppers were a better deal than slaves.......