Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (874942)	7/24/2015 12:47:31 PM
From: PKRBKR	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1578534

I'm really not sure what they could be doing Impeach the bastard! When he gets off impeach him again and again and again. He'll be too busy defending himself to use his pen and phone.

To: i-node who wrote (874942)	7/27/2015 8:03:39 PM
From: THE WATSONYOUTH	1 Recommendation Recommended By i-node Respond to of 1578534

I'm really not sure what they could be doing. .....FIRST.....explain to me the rational behind the Rs giving up the Senate's treaty authority as outlined in the Constitution. The Rs had more than enough votes to block any bad treaty negotiated by Obama/Kerry. They only needed 1/3. So they unilaterally give up their treaty authority and now need 2/3 plus 1 to stop it. In other words, IT CAN'T BE STOPPED. ....and PLEASE don't tell me Obama would just not call it a treaty. He does not get to define what a treaty is or not. If that were the case, he could UNILATERALLY negotiate ANYTHING with ANYBODY at ANYTIME. McConnell and the establishment Rs did this DELIBERATELY. Our founding fathers specifically wrote the treaty clause to guard against one man treaty definition. But they could not envision or guard against a scenario where the entire Congress is nothing but a sellout. We are finished.