SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brumar89 who wrote (880156)8/14/2015 10:49:29 AM
From: TideGlider2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Brumar89
FJB

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1587371
 
The Hillary Clinton email controversy is becoming a slow-motion trainwreck






    Aug. 14, 2015, 8:26 AM


Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/hillary-clinton-emails-story-keeps-getting-worse-2015-8#ixzz3inj5QPE0

It is very likely,” Secretary of State John Kerry confirmed when asked by a CBS reporter if he believed the Russians and the Chinese were reading his emails.

“I certainly write things with that awareness.” The Democratic Party’s elder statesman and former presidential nominee might have known that he was twisting the knife.

While it was perhaps unintentional, his comments reflect an accurate assessment bubbling up from the liberal subconscious that Hillary Clinton has been irreparably damaged by the revelations regarding her scandalous conduct as Kerry’s predecessor at Foggy Bottom.

Hillary Clinton could have surrendered her “homebrew” email server, on which she conducted the affairs of state in violation of both State Department and White House guidelines, to a third party at any time. Indeed, that was the request of the Republican members of the House Select Committee on Benghazi.

If she were so inclined, she could have rid herself of the suspicion that she had something to hide. Clinton might not have found exculpation in a third party investigation of the system that once held over 30,000 deleted emails that Clinton assured Americans were of no interest to them, she would have at least created the impression that she had belatedly embraced transparency.

Instead, she dug in, closed ranks, and bristled with indignation at anyone who dared question her integrity. In the process, Clinton repeatedly misled the public and the press on matters both substantial and paltry.

Hillary Clinton could have done many things to mitigate the damage wrought to her political image by the steady stream of information about her behavior at State. Instead, in deference to the sense of entitlement her enablers have cultivated over a quarter-century, she did nothing.

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/hillary-clinton-emails-story-keeps-getting-worse-2015-8#ixzz3inixlwdh



To: Brumar89 who wrote (880156)8/14/2015 10:59:59 AM
From: Cautious_Optimist  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 1587371
 
Corporate personhood is a long strange game to gain incumbent marketplace advantage.

Actually, in a sense, Corporations have more rights than people today.

Have you ever seen the owners or executives of a corporation, like PG&E or a Virginia Coal Mine company, or an offshore driller that conspired to bypass safety or environmental laws causing human death, be charged criminally as a person?

Should a corporation count as a person in a carpool lane??

Its interesting to note that even John McCain was once a crusader against corporate personhood. Search "Ron Paul Corporations are not people." Its not just liberals who have been fighting this. ronpaul.com

McCain: "Corporations are NOT people."