SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Ask Mohan about the Market -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Defrocked who wrote (12078)12/21/1997 9:55:00 PM
From: Monty Lenard  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 18056
 
Just finished reading F I A S C O. He tells why Japan's banks will probably go kaput. IMHO



To: Defrocked who wrote (12078)12/22/1997 10:41:00 AM
From: Cynic 2005  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 18056
 
Def, is this what you were referring to on Friday?

CALPERS?


Huge Hedging Transaction

Last week, scrutiny centered on one particular options-related transaction
that rattled the futures market. Traders say the transaction, enormous by
the standards of such hedging strategies, appears to have been designed to
protect between $5 billion and $6 billion in stocks for a large institutional
investor. They say that the transaction was executed by Goldman, Sachs
& Co. and that the firm was a heavy seller as it offset its own risk in
Chicago's stock-futures trading pits. Goldman officials declined to
comment.

But Ravi Singh, head of global portfolio trading at Lehman Brothers, said
such transactions are "micro-events" in the recent downdraft compared
with Asian and earnings worries. Michael Rothberg, managing director of
the portfolio trading group at Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., added, "A lot of
people would be very happy to just close the books on 1997 right now.
I'm having conversations with money managers now about what sectors
might be least likely to have earnings shocks and which might be safest in
volatile markets, which they anticipate continuing into the first quarter."