Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ben Antanaitis who wrote (41223)	12/22/1997 10:54:00 AM
From: Tom Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58324

RE: Channel re-check (Albany, NY) To all (just using your post for access, Ben), I returned to CompUSA in Albany this weekend. They were the place jammed with all manner of Iomega products (except Zip internals, of course) a week ago. This time, there were still lots and lots of PP Zips around, but the Zip Plus was completely sold out, and the Jazzes were 'way down, both internal and external. If this one little datum is indicative of the larger pattern, then I'd say that Zip Plus and Jaz are the winners this holiday season. Those knowledgeable enough to buy an aftermarket Zip in the first place, apparently, know that the PP Zip is S-L-O-W and are willing to spring for the pricier Zip Plus if they need a PP Zip solution. At least that's my reading. FYI. Cheers, Tom (long IOM)

To: Ben Antanaitis who wrote (41223)	12/22/1997 11:12:00 AM
From: Cogito	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 58324

All - First results of my testing of Nomai disks I'd like to preface this post by saying that I do believe that Nomai clearly wants the press to report that their disks work just like real Zip disks work. I also believe that casual testing by reporters is unlikely to uncover any serious defects in the disks Nomai is sending out; disk which certainly have been pre-tested before being placed in the hands of the computer trade press. I tested two Zip disks and two Nomai disks in the same way, and my conclusion is that the Nomai disks are inferior in quality, and one of them quite possibly has fouled the heads of one of my Zip drives. I should point out that I have only done the most serious torture test on one of the two XHD disks I was sent. Details follow. The Nomai disks did work in all three of the Zip drives I tried them in, including the Zip Plus, on SCSI internal and one ATAPI internal. They were accepted by the drives, formatting proceeded without incident, and data could be written to them and read back by the system. Any reporter who does only this much testing might conclude that there is no difference between the Iomega Zip disks and the Nomai XHD disks. I would consider this to be a very casual form of testing. I do not have a laboratory with large numbers of drives to do the extremely rigorous testing which this situation demands. I do have a utility which does continuous writes/reads/compares to the entire surface of a disk and keeps track of errors and reallocated sectors. I used this utility first to test two different Zip disks. After 10 hours of testing on each disk, there were no errors and no reallocated sectors. I then tested one of the XHD disks in the same way. After 10 hours of testing, there were no errors but there were two reallocated sectors. This means that data written to a specific place on the disk could not be read back accurately, so those places were marked as "bad" which tells the system not to try to use those areas to store data. Following this test, I decided to check to see if the drive might behave differently with an Iomega Zip disk. In a bit over an hour of testing, there were still no errors and no reallocated blocks. However, I noticed that the drive was resetting the heads occasionally during the read/compare process, which could indicate that the heads have some residue on them causing them to have to retry a read. Since I do not have special equipment to check the heads for residue, I cannot confirm that this is the problem. I should note that this particular drive, the SCSI internal model, is used heavily by my wife, and has never, in my experience or hers, had this problem before. Unfortunately, since my wife does need to use the drive to do her work, and since she also needs to use her computer, I have had to suspend testing for now. - Allen