SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (889010)9/19/2015 2:16:22 AM
From: RMF  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1575396
 
I think candidates USED to run with good intentions, but I don't think that's the case anymore.

Bernie probably has good intentions but there's no way he could win.

Candidates have to SKEW their intentions now just to remain relevant.

What really depressed me about this last debate was that MOST of the candidates seemed to accept that Global Warming was happening but they knew that the U.S. couldn't really solve the problem on its own so they didn't want to even imply that they would do anything to put the U.S. economy at risk.

The BIGGEST thing going right now and NOBODY running for office even wants to talk about it...



To: i-node who wrote (889010)9/19/2015 7:37:17 PM
From: Broken_Clock  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575396
 
most politicians, regardless of party affiliation, have good intentions.
=========== I think you're in the minority.============

75% in U.S. See Widespread Government Corruption



WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Three in four Americans (75%) last year perceived corruption as widespread in the country's government. This figure is up from two in three in 2007 (67%) and 2009 (66%).



While the numbers have fluctuated slightly since 2007, the trend has been largely stable since 2010. However, the percentage of U.S. adults who see corruption as pervasive has never been less than a majority in the past decade, which has had no shortage of controversies from the U.S. Justice Department's firings of U.S. attorneys to the IRS scandal.


These figures are higher than some might expect, and while the lack of improvement is somewhat disconcerting, the positive takeaway is that Americans still feel fairly free to criticize their government. This is not the case in some parts of the world. Questions about corruption are so sensitive in some countries that even if Gallup is allowed to ask them, the results may reflect residents' reluctance to disparage their government. This is particularly true in countries where media freedom is restricted.

This is why it is most appropriate to look at perceptions of corruption through such lenses as the Freedom House's Press Freedom rankings. Ratings vary among countries with a "free press," including the U.S., and range from a high of 90% in Lithuania to a low of 14% in Sweden. The U.S. does not make the top 10 list, but notably, it is not far from it.



These data are available in Gallup Analytics.

Survey Methods

Results are based on telephone interviews with approximately 1,000 U.S. adults each year, aged 15 and older, conducted between 2007 and 2014. For results based on the total sample of national adults in the U.S., the margin of sampling error has typically been ±4.0 percentage points at the 95% confidence level.

For results based on the total sample of national adults across the 134 countries surveyed in 2014, the margin of sampling error ranged from ±2.1 percentage points to ±5.6 percentage points at the 95% confidence level.

The margin of error reflects the influence of data weighting. In addition to sampling error, question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of public opinion polls.

For more complete methodology and specific survey dates, please review Gallup's Country Data Set details.

Learn more about how the Gallup World Poll works.




To: i-node who wrote (889010)9/21/2015 1:28:25 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575396
 
I "voted" for Carter at my school's poll. Mainly because a friend convinced me to do so. Looking back I'm certainly glad that the candidate I "voted for" didn't win. OTOH I do think Carter is underestimated as a president. True that's largely because his reputation is so low that being underestimated is an easy hurdle to jump over, but he did some positive things in terms of deregulation. His policies in general where probably no worse, maybe better, then any other Democrat the could have won at the time.