Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Land Shark who wrote (893225)	10/12/2015 1:11:46 PM
From: longnshort	2 Recommendations Recommended By FJB locogringo Respond to of 1576240

no warming in 20 years sounds like your science is all bullshit, follow the money billions and billions in grants if you just add climate change to your research name

To: Land Shark who wrote (893225)	10/12/2015 1:16:49 PM
From: combjelly	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576240

If PORKERSAM is talking about the same thing as Bonefish, then what we are talking about is the change in heat distribution. Given our wingnuts questionable grasp of science, they have totally misunderstood what is being raised as a possibility.

To: Land Shark who wrote (893225)	10/12/2015 1:23:41 PM
From: longnshort	Respond to of 1576240

To: Land Shark who wrote (893225)	10/12/2015 1:25:33 PM
From: POKERSAM	1 Recommendation Recommended By locogringo Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576240

LS = How do you know your scientist are legit. Maybe the scientist on the other side are the legit ones and yours are a bunch of dumb asses. It sounds to me that you have an opinion and you seek a scientist to "prove" you are right. Any scientist who supports your view is legit. Do a little study of "confirmation bias". It may enlighten you concerning your psychological malady.