Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Land Shark who wrote (893251)	10/12/2015 3:40:29 PM
From: Bonefish	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1576619

Heat is absorbed by the ocean near the equator. That heat is naturally dissipated in a couple of ways. First and slowest is through ocean currents which move toward the poles. (ie gulf stream). The faster way is through the atmosphere. Cyclonically towards the poles as well. Tropical cyclones being more drastic coolers. I believe the earth can take care of any excess heat (produced by human activity, if any) easily. If it wasn't doing that I expect to see more tropical cyclones and of greater strength, which we are not. The AGW alarmists were predicting cat 6 (200 mph) storms years ago. Doesn't seem to be happening. Doesn't mean it won't happen in the future either.That DOESN'T mean we shouldn't be good stewards of the planet anyway. Overpopulation leading to overconsumption remains the problem.