Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Kirk's Market Thoughts -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: weatherguru who wrote (3514)	10/14/2015 11:43:56 AM
From: Kirk ©	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26788

Always good to brainstorm! Good ideas often result. I'm just thinking aloud. LOL I doubt water vapor is considered a greenhouse gas or pollution... I believe us in CA would PAY to have water vapor delivered over our mountains with the hope it condensed and fell as rain. Also, my belief was we'd use fusion or solar to convert water molecules into Oxygen and Hydrogen. Perhaps burn the O2 in power plants to generate more electricity to break more water into Oxygen and Hydrogen while saving the Hydrogen for fuel cells. Anyway, that would be net-net neutral.