Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: I Am John Galt who wrote (29633)	12/22/1997 11:07:00 PM
From: s martin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Could you elaborate on your statement that Roland didn't know where the factories were when you spoke to him. Also, what was the lie Gary told you concerning the $5,000,000 ? Why did you feel unable to speak out about what you knew? TIA

To: I Am John Galt who wrote (29633)	12/23/1997 12:21:00 AM
From: Skeeter Bug	Respond to of 55532

matty, these problems were exactly the types of things that the nays pointed out from day one. i'm glad that you were aware enough to look into the issues pointed out and to do you own dd. then, reach a rational and reasonable conclusion. while what you did was obviously the right thing to me, apparently, it wasn't obvious as so many people walked right over the cliff. as for mork and morgan, there are two questions. one, who is right. two, how did they conduct themselves. both failed on the test on the latter. there is nothing more moral about going long than going short. it is merely your personal perspective. morgan was wrong on the former and mork was right. the fact this company is a complete joke and morgan tried to make it out to be diamonds and pearls is a joke. the fact people believed that crap is more amazing. good luck and learn the lesson. don't mess with penny hype stocks as too much goes on behind the scenes as to render your value added analysis as worthless.

To: I Am John Galt who wrote (29633)	12/23/1997 9:12:00 AM
From: (Bob) Zumbrunnen	Respond to of 55532

Excellent post, Matty. Refreshing to see a post that doesn't fit the "my side is 100% right; yours is 100% wrong" mold. Seeing RMIL halted for an SEC inquiry sure tends to make me believe the "nays" were right, but it's not yet etched in stone. IMO, it's as good as, though. What's been the most educational, though, is the tone of many of the posts in here in light of these new circumstances. Especially that the ones furthest from the subject of what's really happening tend to be coming from the "cartel" side of the fence. FWIW, I'm a former shareholder. I had the misfortune of having loaded up on a lot of shares the day before the unannounced reverse split happened.