Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Ask God -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alan Markoff who wrote (10205)	12/23/1997 12:46:00 PM
From: Jane Hafker	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 39621

Of course you didn't offend anyone. You stated a basic truth. I'm sure Jesus in his babyhood was definitely referred to as the son of Joseph. WHat? Would he be called the son of Ephriam? Hezekiah? Or, of course, called Jesus Son of the New Covenant, as Emile would like. It just reminded me of my own problem with Joseph, especially after Emile flared up once again in full force over the most harmless of statements. Good grief, give me strength.. IS there a direct geneology to Joseph, the man that married Mary? Interesting if there is. I missed that completely, and it at least explains a little about Joseph. I'm off to work, unfortunately. I hope we can ocntinue to discuss very, very interesting points of the Bible that might make other thinks clearer, if it is not done in a mean-spirited manner.