Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Littlefield Corporation (LTFD) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jimmy who wrote (5917)	12/23/1997 3:20:00 PM
From: Musya	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10368

Jimmy, calm down. Mark tried to express his point of view politely. I can second his opinion that we should try to stick to the facts, not wild guesses. If you have some facts, or some logic that leads to a number of 400k or any other number for that matter, let us know. I think everybody will be happy to listen to the new ideas based on facts or logic. But the numbers taken out of nowhere seem strange and not logical. With respect, Musya.

To: jimmy who wrote (5917)	12/23/1997 3:22:00 PM
From: mark cox	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10368

I see that some of you disagree with my post # 5913. So be it. What good investment advice will come out of wild guesses is not clear to me. Now Scott and George, would you please tell me how you based your figures of 400,000 and >400,000 warrants that expired worthless? Why did you come up with those figures? I'm not being sarcastic, I really want to know because I have absolutely no idea how many did. Jimmy you said: "Well, thank you very much... it's comforting to know that you are out there looking out for us dumb schmucks." Jimmy, you posted on # 5888 that you let 30,000 warrants expire worthless. All I did was post my opinion about factless data and you guys started getting on to me about it. I didn't want an arguement, just accurate data displayed. Mark