Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: I. N. Vester who wrote (1807)	12/23/1997 4:53:00 PM
From: Paul Dubsky	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

I agree. We're still waiting on the "word" from the originator, Matthew Leo. Matt? Where are you and do you have a comment? Miscontrued?

To: I. N. Vester who wrote (1807)	12/23/1997 11:56:00 PM
From: Emmo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 27311

I didn't see the post as "rumor". I considered it an interesting angle to all the strange goings on in Nevada. Consider this, if the company is able to produce batteries and a contract in the near future, the next logical step would be to build additional capacity to meet demand. This means lots of money which this company has little of. The source would be additional shares sold to the public or team up with someone with deep pockets. These guys are burning money at a pretty good clip and will need additional cash in the near future if they are to continue. What I would consider stupid is believing the people running this company have the shareholders best interests at heart.