SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Conservatives -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brumar89 who wrote (63184)12/1/2015 12:12:06 PM
From: FJB1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Brumar89

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 124697
 
Katie Pavlich: The Obama administration, not the NRA, sells guns to terrorists



By Katie Pavlich - 11/30/15 06:00 PM EST

In an effort to distract away from President Obama’s failing strategy against the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) and desire to bring more Syrian refugees to U.S. soil, especially after the massacre in Paris, the White House is pulling out the ammunition against its favorite enemy and straw man: the NRA.

Last week during questioning from reporters, White House press secretary Josh Earnest urged Congress to “do something” about the capability for terrorists to easily purchase firearms in the United States.

“Right now, there’s not a law on the books that prevents an individual who is already in the United States and that we already know is suspected of having links to terrorism — that allows them to go and purchase a weapon,” Earnest said. “Members of Congress are prepared to allow those individuals who are already in the United States, and are suspected of having links to terrorism, from going and purchasing a firearm. I think that’s a pretty clear indication that Republicans in Congress are more interested in playing politics, and more scared of the NRA, than they are concerned about doing the right thing for our national security.”First off, France is one big gun-free zone, and the Kalashnikov rifles, grenades and suicide belts ISIS terrorists used two weeks ago to kill 130 people are banned. Second, the so-called “terrorist watch list” Earnest refers to is a clunky, bureaucratic list of hundreds of thousands of people who have no links to terrorism at all.

That list, which contained 47,000 names at the end of George W. Bush’s presidency, has grown to nearly 700,000 people on President Obama’s watch. The fact that they are names, not identities, has led to misidentifications and confusion, ensnaring many innocent people. But surely those names are there for good reason, right?” the Daytona Beach News-Journal editorial board reports.

“Not really. According to the technology website TechDirt.com, 40 percent of those on the FBI’s watch list — 280,000 people — are considered to have no affiliation with recognized terrorist groups. All it takes is for the government to declare is has ‘reasonable suspicion’ that someone could be a terrorist,” the paper continues. “There is no hard evidence required, and the standard is notoriously vague and elastic.”


Currently, legislative proposals in Congress to prevent “terrorists” from purchasing firearms in the United States would require anyone who is simply named on the list to be banned from purchasing a firearm and would do nothing to clean up the list to focus on people truly associated with terrorist organizations. It shouldn’t be surprising that gun control zealot Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) is leading the way, Bill of Rights and due process be damned.

The NRA is interested in protecting the civil rights of Americans, not protecting the ability of terrorists to get guns.

Have suspected terrorists been able to purchase firearms in the United States? The answer is yes, around 2,000 times. Does this fact warrant stripping the Second Amendment rights from citizens who aren’t terrorists because they’re on a government list? The answer is no. Regardless, considering terrorists get firearms in and from all parts of the world regardless of gun control restrictions or laws, it’s an irrelevant argument.

And finally, let me remind the public about the Operation Fast and Furious scandal between 2009 and 2010, when Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives agents, under direction from officials at the highest levels of the Obama Justice Department, approved and sanctioned the sale of more than 2500 AK-47s, .50-caliber rifles and a number of handguns to violent Mexican narco-terrorists.
The secret program, which was eventually exposed by ATF whistleblower John Dodson, ended in December 2010 when Border Patrol agent Brian Terry was killed in Arizona. Firearms from Fast and Furious were left at the scene.

Cartels south of the border actually have a lot in common with ISIS. In fact, ISIS could learn a thing or two from their gruesome tactics. The biggest differences between the two are motive and religion.

Since 2006, more than 60,000 civilians have been killed in Mexico’s drug wars. Hundreds, if not thousands, of Mexican citizens have been slaughtered as a result of Operation Fast and Furious and Obama’s DOJ purposely supplying Mexican cartel members with the weapons they need for murder.

Beheadings, dismemberment, soaking rivals, journalists and pesky civilian opponents alive in acid baths, live burials, mass graves, torture, body dumping, the execution of police chiefs, mayors and other public officials, public hangings, mass slaughter with firearms and explosives and more are all regular occurrences in Mexico. We just don’t talk about it much.

For the White House to argue it’s the NRA that wants to protect the ability for terrorists to purchase firearms is laughable, but it’s especially hypocritical when we revisit the facts of Fast and Furious and the narco-terrorists who are now more heavily armed thanks to the Obama administration.



To: Brumar89 who wrote (63184)12/1/2015 1:00:35 PM
From: FJB1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Brumar89

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 124697
 
VIDEO: Muslim Migrants Approve of ISIS Paris Attacks

Dec 1st, 2015 10:35 am by Jim Hoft

After the ISIS Paris attacks, the Italian television programme “L’aria che tira” asked some asylum seekers what they thought about the attacks.

The Christian migrants were against the massacre.

The Muslims approved.



To: Brumar89 who wrote (63184)12/1/2015 1:03:22 PM
From: FJB1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Schnullie

  Respond to of 124697
 
MUSLIMS Chant “Allahu Akbar” at Pope Francis in Central African Republic (VIDEO)

Dec 1st, 2015 9:12 am by Jim Hoft

Pope Francis visited the African continent for the first time since his papacy this past week. While in Africa the ...




To: Brumar89 who wrote (63184)12/1/2015 6:44:20 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 124697
 
Green Energy Investors Look to Cash in on Paris Talks
Coalition of executives and financiers seeks government subsidies as U.N. climate talks commence

Tom Steyer / AP

BY: Lachlan Markay
December 1, 2015 5:00 am

A group of millionaires and billionaires that includes major investors in green energy are using the international climate talks kicking off this week to push for more government subsidies for the types of companies in which they are investing.

The Breakthrough Energy Coalition on Monday unveiled policy proposals demanding that governments step up their “investment” in green energy companies. The coalition’s founding members include a host of financiers with significant green energy portfolios.

At the same time, the group said it will be leveraging government support in its own investment work, which will target early-stage green energy companies.

Green energy is not sufficiently appealing to private investors at present, the coalition says. Therefore government must step in and provide extensive capital for firms working on wind, solar, and other renewable energy technologies – the types of firms that Breakthrough will be backing.

The effort comes as world leaders gather for a United Nations conference on climate change, where the Obama administration is expected to push for greater government action to reduce U.S. and global carbon emissions.

“In the current business environment, the risk-reward balance for early-stage investing in potentially transformative energy systems is unlikely to meet the market tests of traditional angel or VC investors—not until the underlying economics of the energy sector shift further towards clean energy,” the Breakthrough Coalition’s website states.

“This collective failure can be addressed, in part, by a dramatically scaled-up public research pipeline, linked to a different kind of private investor with a long term commitment to new technologies who is willing to put truly patient flexible risk capital to work,” it adds.

The coalition’s founding members include some of the more prominent such investors. Venture capitalists such as Vinod Khosla and John Doerr and hedge funders such as Tom Steyer and Nathaniel Simons are among the investors listed as founding coalition members.

Khosla and Doerr are two of Silicon Valley’s top investors in green energy companies, Khosla through his eponymous venture capital firm and Doerr by way of the venture capital giant Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers.

Simons is listed on founding coalition documents as a co-founder of Prelude Ventures, a private equity firm that invests in green energy and energy efficiency companies.

Steyer is among the most politically active environmentalists in the country. In addition to his deep-pocketed super PAC, NextGen Climate Action, he is the co-founder of Advanced Energy Economy, a trade association of green energy firms.

His nonprofit grant-making group, the TomKat Charitable Trust, is a limited partner in two investment funds with stakes in green energy and energy efficiency companies.

Profits derived from those ventures are recycled back into TomKat and its tax-exempt environmental activities, according to a spokesperson for Steyer. “Tom Steyer and his wife, Kat, have signed the Giving Pledge to donate the vast majority of their wealth to charitable purposes,” the spokesperson noted in an email.

Steyer has repeatedly touted the profit potential of green energy, stating in 2012 remarks on AEE’s mission that such technologies represent “a chance to make a lot of money.”

“I’ve never been driven by money,” the billionaire hedge fund manager declared two years later. But for those who are, he told a gathering of environmentally driven businesses in New Orleans, green energy “is a great opportunity for you to make a bunch of money.”

The types of investors that Breakthrough hopes to enlist in its efforts “will certainly be motivated partly by the possibility of making big returns over the long-term, but also by the criticality of an energy transition,” its website says.

They hope to have the backing of the 20 governments who have signed on to an effort called Mission Innovation. Those governments, which include the United States, unveiled a joint statement on Monday calling for members to “double governmental investment in clean energy innovation.”

“Business needs to play a vital role in the commercialization and cost-effectiveness of clean energy breakthroughs, and participating countries commit to work closely with the private sector as it increases its investment in the earlier-stage clean energy companies that emerge from government research and development programs,” the statement says.

William Yeatman, an energy policy expert at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, suggested in an email that that type of collaboration between business and government tends to enrich the politically connected.

“There was a $100 billion ‘public-private’ green energy push in the stimulus, which worked out terribly for the public, but richly for cronies of the Obama administration,” Yeatman wrote. “I’d rather not get another dose of that.”

http://freebeacon.com/issues/green-energy-investors-look-to-cash-in-on-paris-talks/



To: Brumar89 who wrote (63184)12/1/2015 8:52:02 PM
From: FJB1 Recommendation

Recommended By
Brumar89

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 124697
 
Record High U.S. Snow Cover For Dec 1...

France's Top Weatherman Hired By Kremlin After Being Fired For Questioning 'Global Warming'...

State Dept 'troubled' by Moscow's move against Soros groups...