SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: 2MAR$ who wrote (908513)12/14/2015 5:54:29 PM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation

Recommended By
FJB

  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1573221
 
Where are the fundamentalist Christians who want to stone adulterers ...... One can probably include every dancer in the Rockette Chorus line, is also against stoning aulterers,even their back-up dancers too!

But there are people who stone adulterers today. I showed you in earlier posts that, based on international Pew polls, significant portions of the Muslim support that. But that isn't the case among Christians. So if you want to talk about fundamentalists, you should recognize they're NOT all the same.

For liberals to respond to acts of Muslim terrorism by commiserating with Muslims and attacking Christians is sick and strange. It makes sense best if you recognize our liberals have accepted dhimmi status - subservience to Islam.

Dhimmitude is the status that Islamic law, the Sharia, mandates for non-Muslims, primarily Jews and Christians. Dhimmis, "protected people," are free to practice their religion in a Sharia regime, but are made subject to a number of humiliating regulations designed to enforce the Qur'an's command that they "feel themselves subdued" (Sura 9:29). This denial of equality of rights and dignity remains part of the Sharia, and, as such, are part of the legal superstructure that global jihadists are laboring to restore everywhere in the Islamic world, and wish ultimately to impose on the entire human race.

If dhimmis complained about their inferior status, institutionalized humiliation, or poverty, their masters voided their contract and regarded them as enemies of Islam, fair game as objects of violence. Consequently, dhimmis were generally cowed into silence and worse. It was almost unheard-of to find dhimmis speaking out against their oppressors; to do so would have been suicide.
.....
http://dhimmi.net/

How about you Mars, do you agree that Mohammed, whom Muslim histories say spent the last decade of his life robbing and terrorizing Arabia, was a false prophet?