Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (909681)	12/21/2015 2:33:24 AM
From: RMF	1 Recommendation Recommended By Metacomet Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572963

I think video cameras and phone cameras are probably the biggest factor in the decrease in crime. I was thinking about being a hired killer for a while but then I realized it's so TOUGH now to kill somebody and NOT be filmed either doing the deed or leaving the scene. It's the same thing for robbery. The idea that a guy was carrying would have made NO difference. The guy would have been dead before he could even think about drawing his gun. If I knew he was carrying a gun it would have provided MORE incentive. I could get his cash and his gun which would be worth at least a 100 bucks. As far as stopping a shooter that was just out to kill as many people as possible I guess a guy "carrying" could save a few lives, but unless he's really good with his gun or very sensible he might actually kill more innocent bystanders than he saved.