Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael d kugler who wrote (30257)	12/24/1997 2:55:00 PM
From: michael d kugler	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

Merry Christmas to all.

To: michael d kugler who wrote (30257)	12/24/1997 4:23:00 PM
From: Michael P. Weber	Read Replies (10) \| Respond to of 55532

Michael, Like we're supposed to believe your not going to post! Give me a break, you live on this board. Regardless of who filed the financials and who put out the press releases, you have no vested interest in RMIL. So why do you take it upon yourself to file complaints with the SEC about a company you have no stock in? And yes you should be held to a HIGHER level of accountability for your actions and posts to this thread!!

To: michael d kugler who wrote (30257)	12/24/1997 6:33:00 PM
From: Riley G	Respond to of 55532

To: michael d kugler (13939 ) From: Riley G Wednesday, Nov 5 1997 11:23PM EST Reply #13977 of 15535 So you admit that D. Mork claims web site CHAOS8 is his. Interesting that his insiders are posting in this public forum. In my book, that's were the stink starts. Is it legal for them to post condidential information here? Is it legal for a known short and CEO of another public company to solicit telephone calls from RMIL shareholders that he is short in. And though an alleged BROKER at that! Riley G ------- To: BGOODY (13914 ) From: michael d kugler Wednesday, Nov 5 1997 11:02PM EST Reply #13941 of 13982 Both websites are Mork's. He doesn't deny that. The pictures are real. Nobody's denying that either. Hell, he's just trying to protect his investment, just like you are. So you can do it and he can't?

To: michael d kugler who wrote (30257)	12/24/1997 6:35:00 PM
From: Riley G	Respond to of 55532

To: douglas hicks (2011 ) From: mawork1 Monday, Oct 6 1997 7:54PM EST Reply #2012 of 15556 October 1, 1997 VIA FAX 202-942-9634 Securities & Exchange Commission Attention: Mr. Al Lapins Tel. 202-942-4681 450 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20549 Re: Olympus Ventures, Inc. Dear Mr. Lapins: -cut to save space------ Magellan Litigation Services

To: michael d kugler who wrote (30257)	12/24/1997 6:38:00 PM
From: Riley G	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Mork still has everyone locked out of his web site that he was using to slame OVIS/RMIL and to test his Megallan Capital Corp site... Riley G ------- To: Riley G (3239 ) From: PUHRTY Wednesday, Oct 8 1997 5:29PM EST Reply #3249 of 15556 Riley, See this!! ixpres.com

To: michael d kugler who wrote (30257)	12/24/1997 6:40:00 PM
From: Riley G	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Looks like Mork and his people were really working hard to HALT RMIL. Riley G ------- To: MZUBOZ (7320 ) From: PUHRTY Wednesday, Oct 22 1997 12:32PM EST Reply #7331 of 15556 Well for one thing, Morgan is no longer CEO of OVIS/RMIL. But regardless of that, there will be no financing, just like there is no 10K or no garment production facility or no water producing. But all this aside, the SEC is going to stop trading this security. Remember, I'm the guy that showed you pictures of all the so-called production facilities. I'm also the guy that told you that American Stock Transfer would not be your new transfer agent. Now, there is more information surfacing about a 5,000,000 share issue of restricted shares issued in November 96 to a company called Heritage International and how 1,000,000 shares of the 5,000,000 were reissued to a company called ATTORNEY BUSINESS ADVISORS, run by a fellow named Zapara in December 1996 and later put on the market as free trading shares. This little trick is viewed by the Regulators as a fradulent transaction and is also a violation of rule 144. There are numerous cases in the SEC files about dealings such as these where the perpetrators go to jail. Hmmm, don't drink the KOOL-AID.