Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Broken_Clock who wrote (917296)	1/26/2016 2:35:50 PM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 1573207

Yep...that's why I know you are FOS.

To: Broken_Clock who wrote (917296)	1/26/2016 2:46:40 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573207

BC, Do you or jl actually know when and where the robo-signing occurs in the process? I don't think it matters when it happened in the process. The question is what difference did the robo-signing make in terms of time and number of foreclosures that were pushed through. How many foreclosures could have been prevented if said robo-signing never took place? You claim robo-signing led to hundreds of millions of dollars in unjust foreclosures, but that's outrageous without any proof of the difference that I pointed to above. The only justification left for awarding free houses to "victims" of robo-signing is if you think these people experienced unbearable "pain and suffering" due to the practice. That makes about as much sense as awarding someone millions of dollars for spilling hot coffee onto themselves. Tenchusatsu