To: Elmer Phud who wrote (274820 ) 2/7/2016 9:12:50 PM From: fastpathguru Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 275872 You are incapable of having accurate and/or honest communication, because you cannot even agree on a language to communicate with An ironic statement from someone who speaks in code. Let's see how long it takes to contradict yourself...Face it, you posted a false trade, got caught then claimed it was a typo. Then you changed your mind and claimed it was a secret code. There it is. Actually, your accusation came first, and when I called your bluff, you fled. So I decided to extract an acknowledgement from you with a pair of pliers... Little did I know how deep that rotten tooth was embedded. You have not once shown me the basis for your original accusation. THAT'S BECAUSE IT WAS A LIE.Then you admitted to posting other false statements as part of your code. For the record, the $0.67 post, where I claimed the previous $1.12 "mistake" was a "typo", was last in the sequence of "typos." (If you claim otherwise, prove it.) Then I had to explain that my "mistakes" were bait (the first of which was explicitly labeled "bait") when you persisted with your oblivious rube act. You've never addressed the fact that I inserted the word "bait" immediately after the first in a sequence of misrepresentations designed to goad you dummies into correcting me. (See the above sequence.)Only later when it was clear that acknowledging my original trade was a line you just couldn't cross, AND you would continue to ignore the painfully explicit signals (you SOB you) and play to oblivious rube (which you still are), didI reveal that the complete sequence had a pattern embedded in it. (Which has obviously gotten deeply under your skin.) Throughout all this, you have ignored 95% of anything I said and selectively quoted anything you have addressed (including your own posts.)Now you want to find an agreed upon language to post in? None of this nonsense would have been necessary if you hadn't posted false trades then tried to cover your tracks with a nonsense secret code. Who did you expect to believe that? How can anyone believe any trade you post after you admit to posting false one? Fact: Your false accusation came first. You fail to address this fact, other than your BS retroactive "proof." I've extensively documented the entire debacle. And by debacle, I mean your long string of lies, evasions, and oblivious rube posts. You can't run from your own lies and willing ignorance. I think you should offer a public apology for posting what you have admitted to be false trades then make a commitment to never post a false trade again. This is a forgiving board. You can return to a respectable level but you must start being honest. I apologize to anyone who has been offended by my "coarse" language in trying to get this lying coward to admit that my original trade was and is completely legitimate. (If you can claim otherwise, prove it.) Furthermore, I promise I never have and never will post a false trade. I promise that if I attempt to "mislead" anyone again, it will again be painfully obvious that my deception has a clear purpose and that only the most oblivious rube in the universe can miss the cues. Satisfied? fpg