Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : CCB vs ZEN truth board -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Glorieux who wrote (3874)	2/8/2016 2:08:45 PM
From: clear	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 12350

[ Now, I have people I know that know Bruce but since NC has never revealed his true identity, how can we have friends in common that I would know about. ] That's it exactly G. But Nucky doesn't seem to be able to grasp the essence of it. Here's his reply to you. One can only credit it to lazy logic. [ Glorieux, a friend in common does not automatically acquaint you and I. ] Nucky, that's only true if it's the 'friend in common' saying it. But you said it, so your comment above is false. Tell me, if G doesn't know who you are, how can he know if the 'friend in common' is even an acquaintance of yours? You have to assume that G knows you in order to make that statement. You were just careless and made a slip, a blunder. I'm sure you do know G but he can't know that you know him if he doesn't know who you are. But because of your obvious slip, we can pretty safely assume that he's met you (without him knowing that you're bob greenfield). You've never stated anywhere that you're anyone other than bob greenfield, have you? Of course not! But bob greenfield is a fictitious name for you. It's not your true name. So nobody that you don't tell in person, can know who you really are. Of course what all this REALLY means is that you're just a liar.

To: Glorieux who wrote (3874)	2/8/2016 2:25:49 PM
From: RuddyMongoose	Respond to of 12350

I have believed for a long time that SmallCap52 aka CEO Duncan also posted as BobGreenField but your posts today have pretty much proven that Duncan is in fact BobGreenField. I also believe that more than one person has been using the BobGreenField alias. That would also explain how Bob knew the contents of the CFO's E-Mails. That also explains why BobGreenField was able to have his entire SH post archive deleted which I suspect was done to hide embarrassing information. It explains how Bob has an intimate knowledge of the CEO's thinking yet Bob claimed he doesn't know the CEO. It reminds me of that old saying: "Give them enough rope and they will eventually hang themselves". The more he posts, the worse he looks. If he was smart he would stop posting on any stock forums. This is beyond hilarious. You just can make this stuff up.