Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Strategy for Achieving Wealth and Off Topic -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sonny McWilliams who wrote (15126)	12/27/1997 11:02:00 AM
From: royco	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27012

Sonny Re: INTCW/conversion Good morning from snowy Bucks. Co., Pa. Understood conversion price stays the same, but if exercised, and Intel up 10-15% at that pt., then when we change over to Roth, the asset value is taxed @ 30% "+". All I was trying to suggest was a nice window of opportunity for '98( w/ 4-installment plan) due to the tough last quarter. AGI limits may affect 4-payment rule. 30% more in taxes on 15% appreciation before converting to Roth could be a nice piece of change. Week or so ago, caught the last of the bulls, Joe Battipaglia from Gruntal, who echoed my remarks previously (See the following siliconinvestor.com that Mr. Greenjeans is behind the times, and should cut short-term rates. the yield curve is not just flat, it will invert, and long term lending will be pointless. For years we've heard the idiots talk about fears of inflation, now its deflation, but short-term rates are way too high, and there's always an excuse to not act. (Not politically correct to hit Alan G., he has no political will to do the sensible econ. thing, and Clinton's allies will not go along IMO). Since Battipaglia said the same thing- I will insist on royalties from CNBC and share the wealth with the Wealth board posters- We can use it <GG>. Happy, healthy New year to you and family. Kind regards, Royco