Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (921435)	2/15/2016 3:27:34 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1577031

>> He was rejected for his stance on civil rights. Well, that makes it easy. Maybe they ought to reject Obama's nominee based on his position on one of the liberal topics almost all Republicans oppose. Perhaps, the right of government to spend money it doesn't have. Not the legal right, of course. But just Senators' preferences. Or maybe create an abortion litmus test the way Democrats have. Bork was a highly qualified legal scholar. He was rejected because he was considered too conservative. No Democrat in our lifetimes has be rejected because he/she was too liberal. Now that Tejek is gone, your posts here have become the most duplicitous of anyone I see.