Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael d kugler who wrote (30699)	12/27/1997 6:34:00 PM
From: DJ Byrne	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Michael, Have you complained to the SEC about RMIL and tried to initiate a halt on the trading? dj

To: michael d kugler who wrote (30699)	12/28/1997 2:46:00 AM
From: shades	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 55532

There seems to be some confusion between what some people consider "slamming". I have merely put out the information the company chose not to divulge. I don't think anyone has challenged my information, and I have tried to be as accurate as possible. Now I state you are a LIAR, a LYING BROKER WHO KEEPS SECRETS, you say you merely put out information the company chose not to divulge, yet you forget to add you also posted my companys web site for the sole purpose of harrassment and that you falsely accused me of being Ellen, I do not think the company had ANYTHING to do with that, that was MIKE D KUGLER 100%. You are digging your hole deeper and deeper, you can try to LIE your way out of it, but SI keeps VERY GOOD RECORDS and your ACTIONS speak FAR LOUDER than your words Mr. Secrets. I have pointed out the inconsistencies between what this company has said and what is really happening. It would appear the SEC agrees with at least some of what I have discussed here. Why not, you are the one that ADMIITTED he contacted the SEC about some of those issues, how long ago did you do this, how long has it been since you made the SEC aware of these issues with the intention to HALT RMIL, and did you do this BEFORE or AFTER you told Riley you could save him, that seems like privaledged info to me. It would appear to be logically unethical not to divulge the facts. MY GOD THE LYING BROKER FINALLY AGREES WITH ME, YOU ARE CORRECT MR. SECRETS, IT IS LOGICALLY UNETHICAL NOT TO DIVULGE THE FACTS, WHAT IS YOUR DAN SECRET, WHAT FACTS ARE YOU NOT DIVULGING, I AM GLAD WE AGREE ON THIS ISSUE. I will admit to a bit more effort to obtain information about this company, since there was rarely any discussion about operations. Generally SI has been a truly remarkable display of due dilligence. The absence of any discussion along these lines, amidst the hype, kept me here. The absence of any discussion about your SECRET kept me here, Mr. Kugler. You are no better than the company you attack. And I am entitled, under the Constitution, to my opinion, just as you are. America, you know.* You may be entitled to your opinion, but you are not entitled to make false accusations against me and harras me Mr. Kugler, your rights end where mine begin and apparently the lying broker in you has forgotten this. You can trust whomever you want to here. You can pick the people whose corporate reputation is in limbo, and thus your investment here, or perhaps even me. I haven't lied to you HAHA, that is funny, I assure you whoever I trust it will NEVER be a lying broker who CLAIMS the only action he ever took here was to make information about the company available that they chose not to divulge for that is a L:IE and that MAKES YOU A LIAR!. Mr Secrets.