To: simplicity who wrote (69520 ) 2/28/2016 12:23:20 AM From: MulhollandDrive 1 RecommendationRecommended By Honey_Bee
Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 124744 let's be CLEAR you and you alone mentioned my name in a derogatory and besmirching way by saying i was lacking in 'dignity' because i what? pointed out that this pro-cruz thread was obliterated by TRUMP? so let you understand completely..if YOU denigrate a fellow poster by besmirching their character because you dislike their POLITICAL stance, then be very careful what you say and how you say it... i've been a poster (veteran) on SI since 1996....got that? i know the rules here...THIRD PARTY attack are not acceptable... so....i'm very aware of what is and what is not acceptable as personal interaction....you CROSSED A LINE by attacking me by name....what did you expect? for me or any other SI'er with whom disagree to sit back and allow your personal attack to go unnoticed or un-responded to? you suggest that my and 'honey bee's posts to you are some type of 'coordinated' attack... i have never posted to you in an 'attack' other than to express (i think probably ONE time) a disagreement with a message that you posted...nor have i ever discussed with honey bee what my responses would be toward you...i only respond to direct messages.....this IS a public forum, so your messages are NOT sacrosanct....get over it...don't flatter yourself by thinking i or anyone else "co-ordinates' messages to you...i think i can count on one hand the number of times i felt your messages warranted a direct response from me despite that? i have RECOMMENDED many, MANY of your messages posted here when i felt it was deserved...meaning? i am not an IDEOLOGUE, and i am willing to recommend posts from whomever, and WHATEVER messages to which i feel is good and accurate....can i say the same about you? most probably not... at any rate...it was YOU who mentioned my name in a disparaging way by way of a THIRD party post against me....i wasn't speaking to you AT ALL yet your felt compelled to disparage me on this forum because you didn not 'approve' of my tone when i noted that the RELIGIOUS (fake pious ) candidate...that would be CRUZ in case anyone is wondering, lost big time in evangelical SC...it was then that you launched your personal attack...third party.... a BIG SI no/no....read SI history and get a clue.... so thank you for your 'apology' ( to the 'board" and not to myself to whom your personal attack was directed) and duly noted .....WHATEVER... next time...try not to attack the character and 'dignity' of a fellow SI 'veteran' and you will have no issue...speak your mind as i would expect you to do...and i will do so as well, but do so without attacking people with whom you disagree PERSONALLY and not on the basis of their ideas and beliefs again, TO BE CLEAR... this is not some type of 'personal crusade' it was YOU who made it personal by using your alinsky tactic to single me out and attack me personally...i had not mentioned you by name....you took it upon yourself to use a third party post to attack my 'dignity'/character... i RARELY post to you and in this particular instance posted NOTHING to you because, quite frankly, i don't see you as an individual worthy of interaction because, well,i see you as basically an ideologue who at some times has something of value to say and whenever you do i 'recommend' you....that of course does not mean i ascribe to *everything* you write because, well...no ideologue here...got it? amazing how you twist your attack upon me and try to make it sound otherwise....you are not fooling anyone...except your limited number of sychophants.... good bye and good luck and yes, that means don't bother with a response since i know how 'concerned' you are with this 'board' no further response is warranted towards you... '