Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Canada Carbon CCB-V -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LearntoTrade who wrote (1374)	2/29/2016 10:45:08 PM
From: LearntoTrade	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1871

Also, this suggesting the dissemination graphite does not follow a function of distance relative to the vein or pod? How can that be? At some distance unknown, I expect the graphite content to fade out, so to speak. So what is this distance and is it a somewhat linear relationship. %grade vs distance? Else there may have been less misses on drill results. Or did they really miss. i.e a visual looked like nothing worth assaying at the time?

To: LearntoTrade who wrote (1374)	2/29/2016 10:46:55 PM
From: NuclearCrystals	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1871

I would counter any potential "bias on her part" argument with company news releases since the articles release, that affirmed the bulk mining scenario. One should not get caught up in the terminology though. It's all about economics and the Miller deposition lends itself to bulk mining on that basis. Having price points on graphite and marble already in the public view makes it very easy to see that it all comes in and the PEA will show just how amenable this deposit is to a bulk mining method.